Disease Management
Disease management concerns with predictive
as well as descriptive aspects of specific disease. What is likely probability
of specific disease outcome, and what are the factors associated with these
outcomes with the focus on actionable factors. One has to separate effects of
causes for specific disease, and that can be done by separating event period
from period of input data collection. Disease management can involve specific aspect
of the disease whose resolution can be beneficial to not only health-providers
but more importantly to the patient. Descriptive component of disease
management involves desirable as well as undesirable patterns – and auctioning on
these patterns involves either supporting them or breaking them and then
measuring effects of these actions for purpose of achieving specific disease
management goals.
Some of the examples of disease
management questions:
- If surgical procedure
"X" is done, then 45% of the time infection "Y"
occurs within two weeks- Why, reasons, contributing factors?
- What, if any seasonal patterns
in emergency room nosocomial infections exist and contributing factors?
- Why do some congestive heart
failure (CHF) patients return to the heart clinic after bypass surgery
for care within 3 moths, while others don't?
- Compare and contrast high length
of stay patient groups based upon bed location, nursing teams, and
treatment modalities.
- Compare and contrast treatment
results or glucose levels for type II diabetic patients for a given time
period, by physician, gender, age group, etc.
- What practice patterns for
managing primary mammogram candidates will yield the best outcomes in
terms of survival rates or complication rates at the least cost?
- What percentage of women in membership
between the ages 40 - 60 have had a mammogram in the last 12 months?
- What is the comparative mean
value of hypertension levels within a certain group or population of
patients and does it fall within acceptable statistical levels? Do
variations in clinical practice patterns have a cause and effect
relationship?
Outcomes Analysis: Clinical and Financial
Clinical Outcomes
A Clinical Outcome is the result of medical or surgical intervention or nonintervention. It can refer to, but is not limited to the following:
- Mortality
- Morbidity
- Re-admittance rates
- Changes in birth and death rates for a global
population, for example, residents of a state
- The outcome of a given diagnostic procedure, lab
result or medical test
- The results for a patient after care, for example,
how long it took to restore the patient's ability to walk, or to work, or
how long and to what degree did the patient have pain
- Did the patient recover, how long did it take
- The patient's own perception of their care and progress.
It
is thought that through a historical record of outcome experiences, caregivers
will know better which treatment modalities result in consistently better
outcomes for patients. Effective Outcomes Management often relies on a
successful data warehousing strategy designed to track historical outcome
experiences in many areas such as epidemiological studies, lab results,
responses to treatments, mortality and morbidity rates, length of patient stay
and clinical effectiveness measures.
Financial Outcomes
The definition of a financial outcome varies depending upon an organization's goals and overall strategy. As an example, financial outcomes might cover measures such as hospital length of stay, net margins, cost breakouts, number of ER visits and office visits - just to name a few.
It would be nice
if we could develop some type of industry wrapper to data mining technology for
the health care market specifically. But for now, this may be an area of
opportunity for AEs because the industry has yet to spend many resources on
Fraud detection and have not developed sophisticated tools and technologies for
not only detecting fraud but for predicting and catching fraud before claims
adjudication.
Fraud and Abuse is
usually defined as "the intentional deception or misrepresentation that an
individual knows to be false or does not believe to be true and makes, knowing
that the deception could result in some unauthorized benefit to himself/herself
or some other person". The most frequent kind of fraud arises from a false
statement or misrepresentation made, or caused to be made, that is material to
entitlement or payment.
Violators and
perpetrators of fraud may include physicians or other practitioners, a hospital
or other institutional provider, a clinical laboratory or other supplier, an
employee of any provider, a billing service, beneficiary, Medicare carrier
employee or any person in a position to file a claim for payment or benefits.
Types of abuses
- Misrepresentation of medical necessity: For example,
a physician who recommends that eye cataract surgery be performed on a
healthy eye.
- Billing errors: Encompasses everything from billing
the wrong date of service to up-coding.
- Over-provision of services: Providing medically
unnecessary tests to generate a fee.
- Misrepresentation of services provided.
- Offering or acceptance of kickbacks, and/or a
routine waiver of co-payments.
Fraud schemes
range from those perpetrated by individuals acting alone to broad-based
activities by institutions or groups of individuals, sometimes employing
sophisticated telemarketing and other promotional techniques to lure consumers
into serving as the unwitting tools in the schemes. Seldom do perpetrators
target only one insurer or target the public or private sector exclusively.
Rather, most are found to be defrauding several private and public sector
victims simultaneously.
Medical Errors
Definition
The issue of reducing medical errors has been a heated political topic and will continue to be controversial in the next several years. It is believed the key to decreasing these errors will be to properly identify them, analyze the causes, and then change the system and/or processes to prevent them from happening in the future. A November 1999 study by the U. S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) cited 90,000 avoidable deaths, 3 million medical errors and 2.2 million avoidable injuries each year attributable to medical errors. That's the equivalent of having one jumbo jet crash per day with 200 people dying in each crash.
The issue of reducing medical errors has been a heated political topic and will continue to be controversial in the next several years. It is believed the key to decreasing these errors will be to properly identify them, analyze the causes, and then change the system and/or processes to prevent them from happening in the future. A November 1999 study by the U. S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) cited 90,000 avoidable deaths, 3 million medical errors and 2.2 million avoidable injuries each year attributable to medical errors. That's the equivalent of having one jumbo jet crash per day with 200 people dying in each crash.
The IOM defines
medical error as "the failure to complete a planned action as intended or
the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim. An adverse event is defined as an
injury caused by medical management rather than by the underlying disease or
condition of the patient. Some adverse events are not preventable and they
reflect the risk associated with treatment, such as a life-threatening allergic
reaction to a drug when the patient had no known allergies to it. However, the
patient who receives an antibiotic to which he or she is known to be allergic,
goes into anaphylactic shock, and dies, represents a preventable adverse event.
- Diagnostic error, such as misdiagnosis leading to an
incorrect choice of therapy, failure to use an indicated diagnostic test,
misinterpretation of test results, and failure to act on abnormal results.
- Equipment failure
- Infections, such as nosocomial and post-surgical
wound infections.
- Blood transfusion-related injuries
- Misinterpretation of medical orders
- Incorrect medicines and/or prescriptions
- Surgical errors
- Lab reports errors.
Most errors
result from problems created by today's complex health care system. But errors
also happen when doctors and their patients have problems communicating. For
example, a recent study supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality (AHRQ) found that doctors often do not do enough to help their patients
make informed decisions. Uninvolved and uninformed patients are less likely to
accept the doctor's choice of treatment and less likely to do what they need to
do to make the treatment work.
Performance Management
in Healthcare
·
How
are our resources (employees, physicians, capital assets) helping us to
accomplish our strategic goals?
·
How
are we going to excel at key business (access, throughput, value of service to
patients) processes?
·
How
are we going to create loyalty (patient satisfaction, physician referrals,
market share) with our key stakeholders?
·
How
are we going to sustain our ability (have enough financial resources) to
enhance the value of the organization?
Full
service performance management programs address each of those four
perspectives.
No comments:
Post a Comment